Tuesday, August 21, 2007

Sykes’ 50 Rules Preview Party!

Charlie’s previewing a few of the rules! Okay, people, let’s parse:

RULE (9): Your school may have done away with winners and losers. Life hasn’t. In some schools, failing grades have been abolished and class valedictorians scrapped lest anyone’s feelings be hurt. Effort is as important as results. This, of course, bears not the slightest resemblance to real life, which still rewards excellence and delivers a sharp poke in the eye to failure.

Despite the wishful thinking of the therapists, counselors, and moon-rock peddlers, life does involves competition, with winners and losers. Some people get hired. Some don’t. Some get promoted. Some don’t. Some pass the bar exam. Some don’t. Some get admitted to the college of their first choice. Some don’t.

There’s an Alice in Wonderland quality to much of public education these days: “Everyone wins, and all must have prizes!” Or at least trophies for participation. In the movie Meet the Fockers, the "Wall of Gaylord" celebrates one character’s lifetime achievements in mediocrity, prompting the character played by Robert De Niro to muse, “I didn't know they made ninth-place ribbons."

Of course they do.

Ouch! Who just poked me in the eye? Was it Charlie again? Christ! Will you stop doing that?

I don’t know what the first eight rules are like, but if this hackneyed point about the schools shows up at number nine, it’s a safe bet this puppy is going to be one hard slog. Plus, and I know I’m not important enough to have my own radio show, I kind of think that quoting a line from Meet the Fockers might undercut your point’s broader intellectual context. Just me.

Still, since I am stooping to address these points, I’ll start with a very serious question: What the hell is Sykes talking about? Kids hear about what failures they are all the time. Not to mention how fat, lazy, and stupid they are.

And, God, yes, we know they’re stupid. Thanks to the nation’s anti-education lobby, all children do in school these days is take one state-mandated test, drill, or pop quiz after another, providing us all with plenty of cross-tabs to chew over. Then, to make matters worse, some prima donna home-schooled punk always manages to waltz away with the national spelling bee every year, giving Sykes even more opportunities to discuss what God-awful failures kids are.

I would estimate that a full 75% of Sykes’ show is dedicated to his documentation of failure at all levels of society, particularly in the schools. Charlie, the kids get it. They’re failures Where’s the stick?

RULE (10): Life is actually more like dodgeball than your gym teacher thinks.
It comes at you quickly; it requires alertness and skill; the outcome is unpredictable; the weak can sometimes overcome the strong; it involves elimination and has both winners and losers…

First, Charlie pokes you in the eye with a stick, then—WHAMMO! he hits you in the head with a dodgeball. I knew kids like Charlie when I was in elementary school. They sucked.

RULE (11): After you graduate, you won’t be competing against rivals who were raised to be wimps on the playground.

The Duke of Wellington once said that “the Battle of Waterloo was won on the playing fields of Eton” – reflecting his view that competitive sports shape a nation’s character. We sure as hell should hope that’s not true about America unless, that is, we plan on going to war against an enemy who also values non-competitive, risk-free, self-esteem building play activities for its young…

If conservatives keep vacuuming all the money out of the education system, no one is going to be left who knows who the Duke of Wellington was—a rabid colonialist who helped crush the Indian people for the cause of enriching the British nobility. Prince Charles probably has a couple of dozen jewel-encrusted dinner services lying about in one of his summer homes that can be traced directly back to the Duke’s efforts on behalf of English imperialism.

Perhaps the most revealing part of Rule 11, however, is Sykes’ contention that our education system exists for the sole purpose of preparing our nation’s youth to conquer foreign enemies abroad.

In summary:

Rule 9: If you make a mistake, someone is going to poke you in the eye with a stick.

Rule 10: WHAMMO! Ha-ha-ha. I really got you, didn’t I?

Rule 11: Prepare to defeat the overseas infidels.

I can see why America needs this book. Of course, I’m probably just jealous.

Soglin has more.

So does Blogging Blue.

7 comments:

capper said...

Reading that tripe makes me hope that State Sen. Lena Taylor runs for County Exec. Then Charlie could look like this every day.

BlueBlogger said...

I may be new to the whole blogging thing, but I'm really becoming fond of debunking conservatives at every opportunity.

Does that make me a bad person?

capper said...

No, blue, it makes you an normal, intelligent person, that doesn't have their head up their ass, like Sykes.

Reaganite said...

You know, that's the problem with bloggers, pundits and most of our political world. People fear conceding that the other person is right, or has done something good, or has a point.

You guys attacked the book because Sykes wrote it, and based on other of Sykes' points of view, rather than addressing the content. You debunked nothing. Ad hominem attcks are not debunking.

Michael J. Mathias said...

Croc-I'm all about debunking; I just haven't found anything yet about the book to debunk.

Anne Quimby Mathias said...

Reaganite *shudder*, I'm confused.

This post is addressing the actual content of the book -- right? He took three of the actual "rules" from Charlie's book (the "content" of the book?) and addressed each of those rules.

So, how is this not addressing the content?

Is it because he doesn't agree with it?

Ad hominem criticism? Please. How do you suggest one separate criticism of the book from that of the author, particularly when the author is such a media persona? It is his persona, that makes this a viable publication -- otherwise, it's a "50 rules" list you'd get as an email forward from an unlikeable aunt, or maybe one of those pocket sized books they sell in the checkout lanes at the grocery store.

God, all these people rushing to defend poor little Charlie. Ya know what -- I think he's doing just fine.

First there were the complaints that we haven't read the book yet, so how could we possibly say anything against it? Unfair! Jealousy! Now we're tackling the actual content -- but, GASP, we don't agree with it. Unfair! Fear! Jealousy!

I will never concede that this is "right", that he has "done something good" or "made a point". This is a tired premise and the content I've seen so far is lazy and old, old, old. Seriously, hang around in any public place long enough and you'll hear someone bitching about this stuff, because none of it is new thinking.

There is one thing Charlie did get right, though -- and that's how easy it would be to crank out some banal bullshit and have his lapdogs line up, salivating for more.

capper said...

Croc-

Besides debunking what Charlie says, I would find it difficult to respect someone who lies (Liz Woodhouse), commits adultery, and is afraid of honest debate. Not only would it be hard for me to respect them, but there is no way that I could seriously consider anything they say about how I should live or think.

You and I have had some interesting debates, and even though we may disagree, I never doubted your sincerity, and you never gave me cause to. But Sykes is a joke who leads a lifestyle that belies what he is preaching.